(in Polish) Sociology of Education 480-ERS-1SOE
The course introduces the student to the sociology of education understood as a critical analysis of the relationship between education, knowledge, power and inequality. Education is approached not only as a system of teaching and learning, but also as a key social institution that classifies individuals, distributes opportunities, produces ideas of merit and ability, legitimises certain forms of knowledge, and contributes to the reproduction or transformation of social order. The main aim of the course is to show that schools, universities and educational systems do not simply transmit neutral knowledge, but also define what counts as legitimate knowledge, who is recognised as a competent knower, which forms of language and behaviour are valued, and how the learner is assessed, compared and positioned within social hierarchies. The course is grounded in classical and contemporary sociological theory, especially in the sociology of knowledge, sociology of education, sociology of science and critical social theory. The student learns and applies the concepts of social construction of reality, common sense, ideology, utopia, relationism, institutionalisation, legitimation, authority, expertise, scientific norms, paradigms, thought collectives, regimes of truth, discipline, surveillance, cultural capital, social capital, symbolic capital, habitus, field, hidden curriculum and platform power. The classes cover the social construction of knowledge and reality, ideology and social position, authority and legitimacy, science as a social institution, expertise, power/knowledge, discipline, hidden curriculum, cultural capital and the reproduction of educational inequalities. Particular attention is paid to how schools and universities classify pupils and students, produce categories of success and failure, define legitimate forms of knowledge, and reinforce or challenge existing social hierarchies. The course also addresses standardised testing, teacher expectations, educational stratification and international comparisons of educational systems, including PISA-related materials. The final part connects the sociology of education with Science and Technology Studies and the analysis of digital media. The student examines how digital platforms organise visibility, attention and credibility, and how algorithms influence what appears important, true or trustworthy. The course is conducted in an individual tutorial format and is based on active participation, discussion, work with texts, worksheets, short tests, individual analytical work and practical analysis of examples. Its purpose is not only to introduce the student to sociological theories, but also to develop the ability to critically analyse education as a social institution deeply connected with knowledge, power, inequality and social reproduction.
The course is delivered in full-time mode as classes comprising 30 teaching hours. The course is assigned 3 ECTS credits. The total student workload is 75 hours and includes: class participation - 30 hours, preparation for classes and reading course materials - 20 hours, completion of worksheets, short assignments and preparation for tests - 15 hours, and independent analysis of educational examples and cases - 10 hours. Quantitative indicators: hours requiring direct participation of the instructor - 30 hours, student’s independent work - 45 hours, total number of hours - 75 hours, ECTS credits - 3.
|
Term 2024:
None |
Type of course
Prerequisites (description)
Course coordinators
Term 2024: | Term 2025: |
Mode
Learning outcomes
Student’s knowledge
The student:
-understands the basic aims, concepts and analytical perspectives of the sociology of education;
-understands education as a social institution involved in the production, transmission, legitimisation and distribution of knowledge;
-knows how educational institutions classify pupils and students and produce categories of success, failure, ability and merit;
-understands the relationships between education, social stratification, inequality and social reproduction;
-knows selected concepts from the sociology of knowledge, sociology of education, sociology of science and critical theory, including the concepts of Berger and Luckmann, Mannheim, Weber, Merton, Kuhn, Fleck, Collins and Evans, Foucault, Bourdieu and Latour;
-understands the meaning of concepts such as the social construction of reality, ideology, hidden curriculum, authority, legitimisation, expertise, power/knowledge, discipline, cultural capital, habitus, field and symbolic power;
-understands how schools, universities, assessment systems, standardised tests, media and digital platforms influence access to knowledge, visibility, credibility and educational authority.
Student’s skills
The student:
-can apply sociological concepts to the analysis of educational institutions and practices;
-can critically analyse schools and universities as institutions that produce knowledge, authority, classifications and inequalities;
-can identify examples of hidden curriculum and analyse their significance for shaping attitudes, identities and educational opportunities;
-can analyse the impact of assessment, standardised testing, rankings and teacher expectations on the educational experiences of pupils and students;
-can use the concepts of cultural, social and symbolic capital to interpret educational inequalities;
-can apply the concepts of discipline, surveillance and normalisation to the analysis of schools, universities and digital learning environments;
-can interpret educational data, rankings and international comparisons, such as PISA, from a sociological perspective;
-can analyse media and digital platforms as contemporary environments of learning, classification and credibility production;
-can participate in academic discussion in English using basic sociological vocabulary;
-can formulate sociological arguments concerning education, knowledge, power and inequality, and relate them to concrete educational examples.
Student’s social competences
The student:
-is ready to critically reflect on the social role of education and on their own educational experiences;
-recognises that educational success and failure are shaped not only by individual effort, but also by institutions, resources, social position and unequal access to recognition;
-demonstrates sensitivity to educational inequalities and their social consequences;
-understands the importance of responsible participation in academic discussion based on argumentation, attentive listening and respect for different perspectives;
-is ready to critically assess their own knowledge and the content they encounter concerning education, science, media and digital platforms;
-can reflectively relate their own assumptions, ways of thinking and social position to the analysis of educational phenomena;
-is prepared to participate critically in debates on education, testing, rankings, expert authority, digital media and social inequalities;
-understands that educational institutions may both reproduce and challenge social inequalities.
Assessment criteria
The course is conducted in an individual tutorial format. This format allows for close, student-centred work focused on systematic understanding of key concepts in the sociology of education and their application to concrete educational phenomena. The teaching process is based on dialogue, guided discussion, individual analytical tasks and continuous feedback from the instructor.
The following teaching methods are used:
a) Short introductory lectures presenting key concepts, authors and theoretical approaches in the sociology of education.
b) Individual guided discussion between the student and the instructor, focused on education, knowledge, inequality, authority, power, discipline and social reproduction.
c) Close reading and explanation of selected theoretical concepts and course materials.
d) Individual concept-matching exercises and worksheets.
e) Short written tasks completed during classes.
f) Short tests checking understanding of key concepts, theories and authors.
g) Analysis of examples from schools, universities, science, media, digital platforms and everyday educational experience.
h) Case-based discussion of educational situations, such as grading, testing, classroom interaction, teacher expectations, hidden curriculum, educational inequality and expert authority.
i) Film and media analysis, including discussion of The Social Dilemma as an example of platform power and the social organisation of knowledge.
j) Analysis of educational data, international comparisons and PISA-related materials from a sociological perspective.
k) Application of theoretical concepts to the student’s own observations and educational experience.
l) Ongoing formative feedback supporting the student’s ability to use sociological vocabulary accurately and independently.
The individual format makes it possible to adjust the pace and depth of discussion to the student’s needs, while maintaining the academic requirements of the course. Particular emphasis is placed on understanding concepts, applying them to educational contexts, and developing the ability to analyse education as a social institution connected with knowledge, power and inequality.
Assessment method:
The final grade is based on continuous assessment throughout the semester. There is no separate final examination. The student is assessed on the basis of attendance, active participation in tutorial discussions, completion of individual tasks and worksheets, short tests, and the ability to apply sociological concepts to educational examples.
Assessment reflects not only memorisation of definitions, but also the student’s ability to use concepts from the sociology of education in an analytical and reflective way.
Components of the final grade
1. Attendance - 20%
Regular attendance is required because the course is based on direct interaction between the student and the instructor. Attendance is necessary for participation in guided discussion, completion of in-class tasks and systematic development of sociological understanding.
Absences may require additional individual work or supplementary assignments, depending on university regulations and the instructor’s rules.
2. Active participation in tutorial discussion - 30%
The student is assessed on active engagement in individual discussions with the instructor. This includes answering questions, asking questions, responding to theoretical problems, giving examples, comparing perspectives and using course concepts during discussion.
High-quality participation means thoughtful engagement with the material, willingness to analyse educational phenomena sociologically, and the ability to connect concepts with concrete examples from schools, universities, media, policy and everyday educational experience.
3. Individual tasks and worksheets - 30%
The student completes short individual tasks during classes. These may include concept-matching exercises, short written answers, interpretation of examples, analysis of educational situations, and application of theory to practice.
The tasks are designed to check whether the student understands key concepts and can apply them to educational contexts such as hidden curriculum, teacher expectations, standardised testing, grading, cultural capital, authority, discipline, social reproduction and platform-based knowledge.
4. Short tests - 20%
Short tests check the student’s understanding of key concepts, authors and theoretical approaches discussed during the course. Tests may include multiple-choice questions, matching tasks, short definitions and short open questions.
The tests focus on recognising, defining and applying concepts from the sociology of education and the sociology of knowledge.
Very good grade -
The student attends regularly, completes all required tasks and tests, actively participates in tutorial discussions, understands key concepts very well, and can independently apply them to educational institutions, inequalities, authority, discipline and knowledge production.
Good grade -
The student attends most classes, completes the required tasks and tests, understands the main concepts, and can apply them to educational examples with only minor inaccuracies.
Satisfactory grade -
The student meets the minimum course requirements, completes most basic tasks, and demonstrates a basic understanding of the main concepts, although their application may be limited or partly imprecise.
Fail -
The student does not meet the minimum requirements for attendance, tasks or tests, or does not demonstrate basic understanding of the course concepts and their relevance to the sociology of education.
Bibliography
1) Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T.
The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Selected sections: introduction, institutionalisation, objectivation, internalisation and legitimation.
2) Mannheim, K.
Ideology and Utopia. Selected sections on ideology, utopia, social position, perspective, relativism and relationism.
3) Weber, M.
Selected writings on authority and legitimacy, especially traditional, charismatic and legal-rational authority.
4) Merton, R. K.
“The Normative Structure of Science.” Selected sections on science as a social institution, certified knowledge, universalism, communalism, disinterestedness and organised scepticism.
5) Kuhn, T. S.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Selected sections on paradigms, normal science, anomalies and scientific revolutions.
6) Fleck, L.
Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Selected sections on thought collectives, styles of thought and the stabilisation of scientific facts.
7) Collins, H., & Evans, R.
Rethinking Expertise. Selected sections on expertise, tacit knowledge, communities of practice and interactional expertise.
8) Foucault, M.
“Truth and Power,” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. Selected sections on power/knowledge, regimes of truth, discourse and expert authority.
9) Foucault, M.
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Selected chapter: “Panopticism.”
10) Bourdieu, P.
“The Forms of Capital.” Selected sections on economic capital, cultural capital, social capital and symbolic capital.
11) Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D.
An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Selected sections on field, habitus, doxa, symbolic power, reflexivity and struggles over legitimacy.
12) Latour, B.
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Selected sections on actor-network theory, following the actors, black boxes, inscriptions, instruments, documents and non-human actors.
13) Orlowski, J.
The Social Dilemma. Documentary movie, 2020.
Additional course materials:
-Presentations on the sociology of education, sociology of knowledge, authority, legitimacy, science, power/knowledge, discipline, cultural capital, fields, STS and platform power.
-Worksheets and concept-matching exercises on Berger, Luckmann, Mannheim, Foucault, Bourdieu and key concepts in the sociology of education.
-Short educational materials on hidden curriculum, teacher expectations, standardised testing, PISA, educational systems and educational inequalities.
-Selected online educational videos and examples used during classes.
|
Term 2024:
None |
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: