Aesthetics - Workshop 430-ERA-1AWS
Profil studiów: general academic
Forma studiów: full-time studies
Rodzaj przedmiotu: Erasmus+ subject
Dziedzina i dyscyplina nauki: humanities: philosophy
Rok studiów/semestr: summer semester
Wymagania wstępne (tzw. sekwencyjny system zajęć i egzaminów: Students have to communicate fluently in English and have basic knowledge of contemporary culture.
Liczba godzin dydaktycznych z podziałem na formy prowadzenia zajęć: 30 academic hours/practical classes
Metody dydaktyczne: Working methods: workshop, multimedia presentations, class discussion, visiting art galleries (on line - Seppo platform).
Punkty ECTS: 5
Bilans nakładu pracy studenta
Activities:
– class participation – 30 hours;
– preparation for class– 50 hours;
– preparing for assignments – 37,5 hours;
– consultations – 7,5 hours;
Wskaźniki ilościowe
Nakład pracy studentki/studenta związany z zajęciami:
– wymagającymi bezpośredniego udziału nauczyciela – 40 godzin, co odpowiada 1,5 ECTS
– o charakterze praktycznym – 85 godzin, co odpowiada 3,5 ECTS
Tryb prowadzenia przedmiotu
Założenia (opisowo)
Rodzaj przedmiotu
Efekty kształcenia
1. Wiedza studentek i studentów (KA6_WG1):
Student has a basic knowledge about aesthetic reflection in understanding of art and culture.
2. Umiejętności studentek i studentów (KA6_UW2, KA6_UK4):
Student can use aesthetic categories in interpreting art and analyzing socio-cultural reality.
3. Kompetencje społeczne studentek i studentów (KA6_KR3):
Student can present their understanding of art with respect for different views.
Kryteria oceniania
Credits: active class participation, reading literature, preparation for classes, oral presentation.
One absence is allowed. In the case of more absences, student should immediately discuss it during the consultation. Unauthorized absence of more than 50% makes it impossible to get course credit.
Literatura
• “Contemporary Aesthetics”, http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/journal.php
• Barret Terry, 1994, Principles for Interpreting Art, „Art Education”, Vol. 47, No. 5, Interpretation, pp. 8-13, http://terrybarrettosu.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Barrett-1994-Principles-for-Interpreting-Art.pdf
• Barrett Terry, 2002, Interpreting Art: Building Communal and Individual Understandings, [In:] Yvonne Gaudelius, Peg Speirs (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Art Education, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 291-300, https://www.academia.edu/34413776/Interpreting_Art_Building_Communal_and_Individual_Understandings
• Bauman Z., 2010, Perpetum mobile, “Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty”, Volume 1, Number 1, 1 October 2010, pp. 55-63(9).
• Berger John, 1972, Ways of Seeing, London: Penguin Books, pp. 7-10; 45-55, http://monoskop.org/images/9/9e/Berger_John_Ways_of_Seeing.pdf.
• Brady Emily, 2012, Smells, Tastes, and Everyday Aesthetics, In: David M. Kaplan (eds.), The Philosophy of Food, University of California Press, pp. 69-86.
• Carolyn Korsmeyer, 2019, Aesthetic Value, Art, and Food, In: David M. Kaplan (eds.), Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics, Springer, pp. 20-26.
• Hagman, George, 2005, Aesthetic Experience: Beauty, Creativity, and the Search for the Ideal, In: Contemporary Psychoanalytic Studies, 5. Rodopi.
• Kilbourne Jean (director), 2010, Killing us Softly 4. Advertising’s Image of Women, USA, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxYcaFzVX08
• Nishimura Kiyokazu, 2011, The aesthetics of Smell and Taste for the Appreciation of Landscape, “Journal of the Faculty of Letters”, Vol. 36, pp. 37-40.
• Siebel Newsom Jennifer (director), 2011, Miss Representation, USA.
• Simmel Georg, 1957, Fashion, „The American Journal of Sociology”, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 541-558, https://sites.middlebury.edu/individualandthesociety/files/2010/09/Simmel.fashion.pdf
• Thomasson Amie, 2012, Roman Ingarden: 3.3 Aesthetic Objects and Aesthetic Values, [In:] Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/ingarden/.
• Winterson Jeanette, Art. Objects: Essays on Ecstasy and Effrontery [excerpt from the book]: http://www.jeanettewinterson.com/book/art-objects/extract/
• Wolf Naomi, 2006, The Beauty Myth, In: Sonia Maasik, Jack Solomon (eds.), Signs of Life in the U.S.A. Readings on Popular Culture for Writers, Boston: Bedford, pp. 486-494.
Więcej informacji
Dodatkowe informacje (np. o kalendarzu rejestracji, prowadzących zajęcia, lokalizacji i terminach zajęć) mogą być dostępne w serwisie USOSweb: